Making Room for Possibility by Clearing 'Can't'
Make room for possibility by clearing out the 'can't'. — Paulo Coelho
Subtracting Limits to Find Space
At the outset, Coelho’s line proposes a subtractive strategy: remove the word that blocks action, and you reclaim cognitive room to maneuver. Cognitive Load Theory (John Sweller, 1988) shows that extraneous mental burden impairs problem-solving; incessant ‘can’t’ statements are exactly that kind of noise. By clearing them, we free scarce attention for tasks that matter. Likewise, Nassim Nicholas Taleb’s via negativa in Antifragile (2012) argues that improvement often comes from removing what harms rather than piling on fixes. In practice, clearing out ‘can’t’ is less about blind optimism than about decluttering the mind so viable options can surface.
How Words Shape What We Attempt
From there, language becomes the architecture of what we dare to do. Research on linguistic framing suggests that words steer perception and behavior (see Lera Boroditsky’s work on language and cognition, 2011). In the realm of achievement, Carol Dweck’s Mindset (2006) shows how replacing ‘I can’t’ with ‘I can’t yet’ nudges the brain toward learning rather than avoidance. Similarly, Ethan Kross’s findings on distanced self-talk—using your own name or the third person—can reduce stress and clarify choices (Chatter, 2021). Thus, adjusting our phrasing is not cosmetic; it functionally shifts our stance from defense to exploration.
Expectancy, Attention, and the Brain
In turn, neuroscience illuminates why clearing ‘can’t’ matters. Expectation changes physiology: in a classic field study, hotel attendants who were told their work counted as exercise showed improved health markers without changing routines (Crum & Langer, 2007). Expectancy also shapes attention; the brain’s reticular activating system prioritizes stimuli aligned with our goals, meaning a ‘can’ orientation literally helps us notice enabling cues. Predictive processing accounts (e.g., Karl Friston) add that our brains continually compare predictions to evidence; if the standing prediction is ‘can’t,’ disconfirming opportunities may be filtered out. Rewriting that prediction opens the perceptual gate.
When ‘Impossible’ Became Yesterday’s Benchmark
History reminds us that collective ‘can’t’ often precedes swift redefinition. Consider Roger Bannister’s sub–four-minute mile in 1954: once he crossed 3:59.4, the psychological barrier collapsed and many followed within years, revealing that the wall was partly mental. Earlier, the Wright brothers’ 1903 flight transformed heavier‑than‑air flight from fantasy into engineering problem. These episodes don’t deny limits; rather, they show how removing the reflexive ‘can’t’ invites experiments that tighten feedback loops. Possibility, once tested, recalibrates what entire communities expect and attempt.
Practical Ways to Clear the ‘Can’t’
Practically speaking, start with a one‑week ‘can’t inventory’: jot every limiting statement, then rewrite each as ‘not yet, until/unless…’ with a specific condition. Convert wishes into implementation intentions—If X, then I will Y (Peter Gollwitzer, 1999)—to reduce hesitation at the moment of choice. Shrink the first step using Tiny Habits (BJ Fogg, 2019), so momentum replaces dread. Shape your environment—put tools in reach, add reminders, remove friction—and practice improv’s ‘yes, and’ for brainstorming, deferring judgment until after ideation. As these small shifts accumulate, the mental room once occupied by ‘can’t’ fills with testable options.
Balancing Possibility with Wise Constraints
Finally, clearing ‘can’t’ is not ignoring reality; it is distinguishing physics from fear. Use a pre‑mortem (Gary Klein, 2007): imagine the project failed, list reasons, then design guardrails. Favor reversible ‘two‑way door’ experiments (Jeff Bezos’s 2016 letter) to learn cheaply before committing. Consult base rates to counter wishful thinking, then escalate only when evidence warrants. In this way, possibility thinking partners with prudent design—hope sets direction, tests provide traction. The result is a disciplined optimism: not everything will work, but more things become possible because you made room for them.