Daring to Dream Beyond the Fear of Failure
What would you attempt to do if you knew you would not fail? — Robert H. Schuller
The Question That Suspends Consequences
Robert H. Schuller’s question, “What would you attempt to do if you knew you would not fail?” invites us to imagine a world where the usual consequences of risk simply vanish. By momentarily removing the possibility of failure, he bypasses our reflexive caution and exposes our deeper, often hidden desires. This framing does not ask what is reasonable or likely, but what is truly wanted. In doing so, it functions less as a practical inquiry and more as a mirror, reflecting back the ambitions we usually mute to protect ourselves from disappointment.
Uncovering Buried Ambitions and Quiet Longings
Once the fear of failure is lifted, many people suddenly think of paths they dismissed long ago: changing careers, writing a book, starting a community project, or reconciling with someone estranged. These ideas may have felt “unrealistic,” yet their immediate appearance reveals that they never actually disappeared. Similar to how Abraham Maslow’s hierarchy of needs (1943) suggests that self-actualization sits above safety concerns, Schuller’s question gently moves us past survival thinking. In this space, our responses reveal what we find most meaningful, even if we rarely admit it aloud.
The Paralyzing Power of Failure Fear
However, the question also exposes how powerfully fear shapes our choices. Psychological research on “loss aversion,” popularized by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky (1979), shows that people are more motivated to avoid losses than to pursue gains. This bias subtly governs everyday decisions: we cling to unfulfilling routines rather than risk embarrassment, rejection, or financial uncertainty. By imagining guaranteed success, Schuller highlights how much of our life is organized not around what we desire, but around what we dread. The gap between our answer and our current reality becomes a measure of fear’s influence.
From Hypothetical Courage to Practical Next Steps
Yet the question is not meant to leave us in fantasy. Once we identify what we would attempt without fear, the challenge is to translate that dream into an actionable, imperfect plan. Instead of waiting for certainty, we can deconstruct the vision into small, tolerable experiments: a first class, a prototype, a single honest conversation. This echoes the “growth mindset” described by Carol Dweck (2006), where effort and learning are valued over flawless outcomes. By shrinking the stakes of each step, we move closer to the imagined future, accepting that some failure is not a catastrophe but a teacher.
Redefining Failure as a Necessary Companion
Ultimately, Schuller’s provocation matters because in real life, failure is never fully absent. The deeper lesson is to redefine our relationship with it. Thomas Edison’s oft-cited remark—“I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work”—illustrates an orientation where setbacks are data, not verdicts. When failure is reframed as feedback, the original question subtly shifts: not “What would you do if you could not fail?” but “What is so important that you are willing to fail for it?” Answering that transforms the thought experiment into a compass for a braver, more intentional life.