Measure success by the courage to begin again, not by the height of the peak. — John Steinbeck
—What lingers after this line?
One-minute reflection
Where does this idea show up in your life right now?
Redefining What Counts as Success
John Steinbeck’s line pivots success away from a dramatic summit and toward a quieter, repeatable act: beginning again. Instead of treating achievement as a single, towering “peak,” he frames it as a measure of resilience—the willingness to return to the work after disappointment, detours, or fatigue. This shift matters because peaks are scarce and often visible only in hindsight, while restarting is available in every season of life. In that sense, Steinbeck invites a more humane scoreboard, one that credits persistence and self-renewal rather than the optics of triumph.
The Courage Hidden in the Reset
Beginning again is rarely glamorous; it asks us to face the part of ourselves that failed, misjudged, or simply ran out of strength. Yet Steinbeck suggests that the real test of character lies precisely there—when pride would prefer we quit, and fear would prefer we not risk a second attempt. From this angle, courage is not only charging forward but also returning to the starting line without certainty. The restart becomes an act of honesty: acknowledging what happened, carrying forward what was learned, and stepping back into uncertainty anyway.
Why Peaks Can Mislead
While peaks can inspire, they can also distort our sense of worth by implying that only the largest outcomes count. Steinbeck’s contrast implies that a peak is often dependent on timing, resources, health, and luck—conditions that fluctuate regardless of effort. Consequently, measuring life by peaks can punish people for circumstances outside their control, or trap them in comparison. By focusing instead on the capacity to begin again, Steinbeck anchors success in something more stable: agency, endurance, and the decision to keep participating in one’s own life.
Failure as a Chapter, Not a Verdict
Steinbeck’s standard assumes that setbacks are not disqualifying; they are part of the narrative. This aligns with the practical wisdom found in Samuel Beckett’s oft-cited line from “Worstward Ho” (1983): “Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better.” Both statements treat failure as information rather than identity. With that framing, the most meaningful progress may happen between visible milestones—in the revisions, the retraining, the apology, the renewed habit. The story continues not because the peak was reached, but because the person chose to write another page.
Building a Life Through Small Restarts
Once success is linked to restarting, it becomes easier to notice the everyday forms of bravery: applying again after rejection, returning to sobriety after relapse, rewriting a draft that collapsed, or rebuilding trust after a difficult season. These moments rarely earn applause, yet they are often the true architecture of a life. In that way, Steinbeck’s metric also makes success cumulative. Each restart strengthens the next one, creating a pattern of resilience that outlasts any single achievement and prepares us for change—whether chosen or forced.
A Practical Metric You Can Actually Use
Finally, Steinbeck offers a standard that can guide decisions: when evaluating your progress, ask less “How high did I climb?” and more “How willing am I to try again?” The first question can freeze you in perfectionism; the second invites motion. This doesn’t dismiss ambition or excellence—it simply relocates their foundation. Peaks may come as a consequence, but the deeper success is the ability to re-enter the arena, again and again, with clearer eyes and an undiminished willingness to begin.