Nothing is enough for the man to whom enough is too little. — Epicurus
—What lingers after this line?
One-minute reflection
Where does this idea show up in your life right now?
The Hunger That Has No Finish Line
Epicurus points to a peculiar kind of poverty: not the lack of resources, but the inability to recognize sufficiency. If a person treats “enough” as “too little,” then every gain becomes merely a new baseline for dissatisfaction, and desire keeps moving the goalposts. In that sense, the problem is not what life provides but what the mind demands. This observation sets up a quiet warning. The more someone is trained to feel perpetually short of satisfaction, the more they become dependent on external accumulation—money, status, novelty—to soothe an internal restlessness that quickly returns.
Epicurean Contentment and Natural Limits
To see why Epicurus frames the issue this way, it helps to recall his broader teaching: pleasure, rightly understood, is not endless indulgence but the stable relief of unnecessary pain and turmoil. In his “Letter to Menoeceus” (c. 300 BC), Epicurus argues that some desires are natural and necessary, while others are empty and socially manufactured. From that angle, the person for whom “enough is too little” is trapped in the “empty” category—desires without a natural stopping point. As a result, even abundance fails to produce peace, because the desire itself was never designed to be satisfied.
The Paradox of Abundance Without Satisfaction
Once “enough” loses meaning, abundance can backfire. Each improvement in comfort can sharpen the fear of losing it, and each achievement can raise the standard for what counts as acceptable. Modern life supplies endless metrics—followers, promotions, possessions—that can turn satisfaction into a performance rather than a felt experience. This is why Epicurus’ line reads like a paradox: the person who has “enough” might still live as if deprived. What looks like success from the outside becomes anxiety on the inside, because contentment has been outsourced to the next acquisition.
A Simple Anecdote of Escalating Wants
Imagine someone who upgrades their phone every year. The first upgrade feels liberating—better camera, faster speed—yet a week later it becomes ordinary, and soon the older model seems “unacceptable.” Next year, the same cycle repeats, not because the previous phone stopped meeting real needs, but because “enough” has been redefined downward. In this everyday loop, Epicurus’ point becomes concrete: if adequacy is experienced as insufficiency, then every solution becomes temporary. The purchase doesn’t fail; the standard of satisfaction does.
Psychology: Hedonic Adaptation and the Moving Baseline
What Epicurus described philosophically is echoed by modern psychology in the idea of hedonic adaptation: people tend to return toward a stable level of happiness after positive or negative changes. As circumstances improve, expectations often rise alongside them, which can make progress feel strangely empty. Seen this way, “enough is too little” names a cognitive trap: the mind treats yesterday’s luxury as today’s necessity. Without deliberate correction—gratitude, reflection, value-based limits—adaptation turns life into a treadmill where speed increases but arrival never comes.
Relearning “Enough” as a Skill, Not a Gift
Epicurus is not praising complacency; he is describing a kind of freedom. If you can define “enough” in terms of genuine needs and chosen values, then you regain control over desire rather than being driven by it. Contentment becomes an active practice: discerning which wants lead to lasting ease and which merely stimulate more wanting. From there, the quote resolves into practical wisdom. The man who cannot accept “enough” will never feel rich; the person who can recognize sufficiency can feel secure even with modest means, because peace is no longer held hostage by the next upgrade.