Human Rights as the Foundation of Global Freedom
Created at: May 27, 2025
Freedom means the supremacy of human rights everywhere. Our support goes to those who struggle to gain those rights or keep them. — Franklin D. Roosevelt
Defining Freedom Through Human Rights
Franklin D. Roosevelt’s proclamation immediately links the concept of freedom to the universal prevalence of human rights. Rather than viewing freedom as a vague or abstract quality, Roosevelt anchors it firmly in the lived experiences and protections afforded to people everywhere. This definition elevates human rights to a status not just as moral imperatives but as the very criteria by which societies can be considered genuinely free.
The Historical Backdrop of Roosevelt’s Statement
Roosevelt issued these words during a time of immense global turmoil—the Second World War. The atrocities witnessed during this period, particularly in fascist regimes, underscored the dangers of rights being restricted or denied. Against this grim historical background, Roosevelt’s message was both a rallying cry and a moral stance, positioning the United States as an advocate for those seeking liberty and justice around the world.
Solidarity With the Oppressed
Transitioning from the theoretical to the practical, Roosevelt explicitly commits support to individuals and peoples who are either fighting to obtain or to defend their rights. This promise forms the basis of international solidarity, echoing subsequent doctrines, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948. By articulating this support, Roosevelt sets a precedent for moral responsibility that transcends national boundaries.
Shaping Foreign Policy and International Law
Roosevelt’s stance had profound implications for international relations. From this foundation, postwar foreign policy often invoked human rights as both a justification for intervention and a measure of alliances. The formation of the United Nations and the adoption of human rights treaties can be traced to ideals set forth by leaders like Roosevelt, who believed that the struggle for liberty was not confined within borders.
A Legacy of Vigilance and Advocacy
Finally, Roosevelt’s vision endures as an ongoing imperative. Today, his assertion reminds us that the struggle for human rights is a continuous effort—one requiring vigilance and steadfast support. Whether confronting censorship, discrimination, or authoritarianism (as seen in global movements such as Amnesty International), the call to aid those striving for their rights remains a guiding principle in human coexistence.