Progress Over Perfection: Baldwin’s Call to Persevere
Created at: August 10, 2025
Choose persistence over perfection and keep walking. — James Baldwin
Baldwin’s Imperative: Keep Moving
James Baldwin’s line urges a decisive shift from flawless ideals to steady effort. Read alongside his essays—Notes of a Native Son (1955) and The Fire Next Time (1963)—the phrase ‘keep walking’ becomes both moral and practical counsel: advance despite uncertainty, revise when necessary, refuse paralysis. In The Paris Review interview ‘The Art of Fiction No. 78’ (1984), Baldwin describes writing as patient, continual labor—sentence after sentence—revealing how persistence builds the only perfection that matters: a living truth on the page. Thus the walk is not aimless; it is deliberate stride, mile by mile, toward clarity.
Why Perfection Freezes Progress
Perfection tempts us with the mirage of certainty, but it often stalls action. Psychological research shows that perfectionism correlates with procrastination, anxiety, and burnout (Flett & Hewitt, 2002). By contrast, Herbert Simon’s ‘satisficing’ (1956) reframes success as ‘good enough to move forward,’ making space for learning to compound. Baldwin’s imperative leverages this insight: movement—however modest—generates feedback, and feedback refines judgment. In other words, a workable step today outruns an immaculate plan that never leaves the desk.
Craft, Drafts, and the Writer’s Walk
Baldwin embodies persistence through the evolution of Go Tell It on the Mountain (1953), a novel shaped over years and continents after he left Harlem for Paris in 1948. He revised relentlessly, not to polish away humanity but to reveal it. This rhythm echoes Anne Lamott’s counsel to embrace ‘shitty first drafts’ in Bird by Bird (1994): begin, iterate, discover. As pages accumulate, so does courage; and as courage grows, insight deepens. The work teaches the worker—step by step.
From Page to Pavement: Collective Stride
Baldwin’s admonition also suits public life, where progress rarely arrives in a single triumph. The Selma to Montgomery marches (1965) literalized the ethic: people walked, were turned back, then walked again. Baldwin’s 1965 debate at the Cambridge Union against William F. Buckley Jr. showed similar stamina in argument—returning, clarifying, pressing forward. Social change advances through iterative pressure and durable coalitions; purity tests fracture, while persistence knits small gains into lasting reform.
The Science of Small Wins
Motivation research affirms the momentum of modest progress. Teresa Amabile and Steven Kramer’s The Progress Principle (2011) documents how visible small wins boost engagement and creativity. Likewise, Carol Dweck’s ‘growth mindset’ (2006) reframes setbacks as information rather than verdicts. Baldwin’s counsel aligns with both findings: choose repeatable actions, celebrate incremental movement, and let learning guide the next step. Over time, these compounding gains eclipse the stalled dream of perfection.
Learning to Love Imperfection
Finally, persistence flourishes when we befriend imperfection. The Japanese aesthetics of wabi-sabi and the repair art of kintsugi honor cracks as part of an object’s story, not stains to be hidden. Baldwin’s prose likewise embraces fracture to illuminate truth. Accepting seams does not lower standards; it raises courage. So we begin, err, correct, and continue—because the road clarifies what the map could not. The task, as he says, is simple and stern: keep walking.