Freedom’s Purpose: Extending Liberation Beyond the Self
Created at: August 10, 2025
The function of freedom is to free someone else. — Toni Morrison
Freedom as a Generative Responsibility
At the outset, Morrison’s line reframes freedom from a private possession into a public responsibility. Rather than ending at self-emancipation, real freedom compels us outward, insisting that our autonomy becomes credible only when it creates room for someone else’s. This move shifts the moral center: liberation is not a finish line but a relay, where the baton of dignity must be passed along to endure.
Language as a Tool for Liberation
From this premise, Morrison’s own craft shows how words can unshackle or bind. In her Nobel Lecture (1993), she warned that oppressive language is not merely descriptive; it enacts harm. Her novels dramatize counter-speech that heals. In Beloved (1987), the practice of “rememory” lets characters reclaim stories that slavery tried to erase, demonstrating how narrative repair can free a community from inherited silence. Likewise, Playing in the Dark (1992) exposes the racial scaffolding of American letters, loosening readers from unexamined assumptions.
Historical Echoes of Shared Emancipation
Historically, those who gained freedom often treated it as a mandate to return for others. Harriet Tubman, after escaping slavery, made repeated journeys to lead roughly seventy people to safety (c. 1850s), embodying freedom as service. A century later, Fannie Lou Hamer’s testimony at the 1964 Democratic National Convention turned personal suffering into a lever for collective voting rights. Across eras, the pattern holds: freedom authenticated by the risks it takes for someone else.
Organizing Models that Multiply Freedom
Moving from exemplars to methods, Ella Baker’s philosophy—“Strong people don’t need strong leaders” (c. 1960)—seeded the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, emphasizing horizontal power that equips others to act. In parallel, Paulo Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed (1970) argued for dialogic education in which teacher and student co-create knowledge. Both approaches convert personal insight into shared capacity, turning freedom from a scarce resource into a renewable practice.
Law, Imagination, and the Work That Remains
Legal milestones like the Civil Rights Act (1964) and Voting Rights Act (1965) formalized gains, yet Morrison’s maxim reminds us statutes alone cannot complete the task. Rights erode without the imagination and effort to keep widening their reach. Philosophies of interdependence—evoked by the Southern African notion of ubuntu, “I am because we are”—clarify why: my freedom is secured only to the extent yours is recognized and protected.
Contemporary Practices of Liberating Others
In our present, the mandate translates into concrete habits: platform-sharing, mentorship, and resource redistribution. Tarana Burke’s early #MeToo work (2006) centered survivors’ voices so that individual healing built community power. Likewise, ACT UP’s coalition tactics in the late 1980s transformed private grief into public health victories. These examples align with Morrison’s charge: when our gains open corridors for others, freedom fulfills its function.