Site logo

Following Fascinations: A Blueprint for Vital Living

Created at: September 4, 2025

Do whatever brings you to life, then. Follow your own fascinations, obsessions and compulsions. — El
Do whatever brings you to life, then. Follow your own fascinations, obsessions and compulsions. — Elizabeth Gilbert

Do whatever brings you to life, then. Follow your own fascinations, obsessions and compulsions. — Elizabeth Gilbert

From Permission to Imperative

Elizabeth Gilbert’s line moves beyond mere encouragement; it grants permission to treat what enlivens you as a non-negotiable. In Big Magic (2015), she argues that creative living is less about grand destiny and more about a steady allegiance to what sparks curiosity. Her cadence—“then… follow”—turns a suggestion into a summons. In this light, the quote echoes Joseph Campbell’s invitation to “follow your bliss” in The Power of Myth (1988). Yet Gilbert’s version feels earthier: not abstract bliss, but concrete fascinations, obsessions, and compulsions. With that shift, we can connect the idea to research on motivation rather than mystique.

The Psychology of Intrinsic Drive

Building on this, Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985) shows that autonomy, competence, and relatedness fuel sustainable motivation. When we pursue what genuinely fascinates us, autonomy is honored and energy becomes self-replenishing. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi’s Flow (1990) further explains how attention locks onto challenges matched to skill, producing absorption and joy. Therefore, Gilbert’s counsel is not indulgence but design: aligning work with internal reward systems. Once aligned, effort feels less like willpower and more like gravity—pulling us back to the task with quiet, persistent force.

Obsession as the Craftsperson’s Engine

Extending this logic, obsession can be the depth charge that turns interest into mastery. Charles Darwin’s eight-year barnacle study (1846–1854) honed classification skills that later fortified On the Origin of Species. Likewise, Marie Curie’s prolonged, painstaking reduction of pitchblende (c. 1898) exemplifies an absorbing focus that outlasts novelty. These stories reveal a pattern: the longer we accompany a question, the more it transforms both the work and the worker. Yet obsession has edges; recognizing them clarifies Gilbert’s inclusion of “compulsions.”

Compulsions: Shadow and Signal

At the same time, compulsion can signal either a fruitful calling or a drain. Twyla Tharp’s The Creative Habit (2003) frames ritualized repetition as scaffolding for creative risk, while Cal Newport’s Deep Work (2016) shows how deliberate constraints channel attention without burnout. A practical distinction is experiential: after engaging, do you feel more alive or more diminished? If vitality rises, the compulsion is likely a signal. If it collapses, it may be a shadow—an invitation to recalibrate boundaries, rest cycles, or goals before intensity curdles.

Turning Fascination into Practice

Consequently, the path forward is experimental. Peter Sims’s Little Bets (2011) and Saras Sarasvathy’s effectuation research (2001) recommend small, affordable moves that test fascination in reality. A 20-minute daily practice, a weekend prototype, or a single public post can convert private energy into actionable momentum. These micro-commitments protect curiosity from perfectionism. By keeping stakes low and cadence steady, you compound learning while preserving the very spark you’re trying to follow.

Sharing Work to Multiply Energy

Moreover, sharing attracts allies. Linus Torvalds’s 1991 “just a hobby” post seeded Linux, demonstrating how personal itch can scale through community. Likewise, writing circles, open-source repos, or studio critiques supply feedback loops that sharpen craft and sustain morale. As attention meets audience, motivation becomes reciprocal: your work energizes others, and their response returns energy to you. This exchange turns solitary fascination into a collaborative engine.

Sustaining the Long Arc

Finally, vitality needs rhythm. Jim Loehr and Tony Schwartz’s The Power of Full Engagement (2003) argues that we manage energy—not time—by oscillating between focus and renewal. Seasons of immersion must be matched by recovery to prevent the erosion of curiosity into fatigue. Returning to Gilbert, the mandate is elegantly simple: arrange your days so what brings you to life appears on the calendar. Then, keep it there—lightly, repeatedly—until fascination becomes a way of being.