Be Whole: Greatness Without Excess or Omission
Created at: September 8, 2025
To be great, be whole; exclude nothing, exaggerate nothing that is you. — Fernando Pessoa
Wholeness as the Measure of Greatness
At first glance, Pessoa’s injunction is both rigorous and liberating: to be great, one must be whole—a self neither pruned nor inflated. ‘Exclude nothing’ rejects the quiet erasures we perform on our fears, desires, and contradictions; ‘exaggerate nothing’ rebukes the theatrical amplifications that turn traits into brands. Taken together, the line proposes a symmetry: greatness is not loudness or perfection but integrity, the accurate inclusion and proportion of what is already us. From this starting point, wholeness becomes a craft of composition rather than conquest—arranging the parts so none is missing and none overpowers. The next step is to see how Pessoa himself staged this paradox in his art.
Pessoa’s Many Selves and Their Host
Indeed, Pessoa dramatized plurality through his heteronyms—fully fledged authors with distinct styles and philosophies. Alberto Caeiro wrote plain-spoken nature poems; Álvaro de Campos thundered with futurist ardor; Ricardo Reis favored stoic measure; and Bernardo Soares, the semi-heteronym, kept The Book of Disquiet. Rather than choose a single mask, Pessoa became their host, granting each voice room without letting any one voice claim the whole stage. Here the aphorism clarifies its demand: the task is neither to suppress a temperament nor to let it monopolize identity. To be whole is to acknowledge each genuine impulse while preserving proportion, so the self remains an orchestra, not a soloist shouting over the rest.
The Classical Mean, A Living Proportion
Moving from literature to ethics, Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics (c. 4th century BC) frames virtue as the mean ‘relative to us,’ not a bland average but a fitting proportion. Courage, for example, lies between rashness and cowardice—neither exclusion of fear nor exaggeration of bravado. This classical balance echoes Pessoa’s twofold caution: include the relevant feelings, yet do not swell them into spectacle. A modern poetic parallel appears in Walt Whitman’s ‘I am large, I contain multitudes’ (Song of Myself, 1855). The line affirms inclusion, but the work’s careful cadences model form. Thus, proportion becomes the thread that binds breadth to fidelity.
Psychological Integration Over Performance
Turning to psychology, C. G. Jung’s individuation describes growth as integrating the shadow—those disowned traits we prefer to omit—into conscious life (Collected Works, vol. 9ii). ‘Exclude nothing’ invites this honest inclusion; ‘exaggerate nothing’ tempers the performative identities that inflate one part to hide the rest. Empirically, Patricia Linville (1987) found that greater self-complexity can buffer stress, suggesting that richer, well-differentiated selves are more resilient. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (Hayes, Strosahl, Wilson, 1999) adds a practical lens: accept inner experience, defuse from domineering self-stories, and act by values. In that arc, authenticity is neither confession-as-theater nor denial-as-discipline, but a steady integration oriented toward what matters.
Form, Constraint, and Creative Truth
In practice, ‘exaggerate nothing’ does not stifle intensity; it channels it. Igor Stravinsky’s The Poetics of Music (1942) argues that constraints liberate: ‘The more constraints one imposes, the more one frees oneself.’ Within Pessoa’s universe, Ricardo Reis’s chiseled odes embody this principle—emotion carried by measure, not muffled by it. Creativity therefore hinges on fidelity, not volume: include the full palette of feeling and thought, but let form keep each color true. Proportion does not mute truth; it tunes it, allowing different registers to resonate without drowning one another.
In Leadership, Inclusion Without Spin
The same grammar of wholeness appears in public life. Abraham Lincoln’s ‘team of rivals’ (Goodwin, 2005) exemplified ‘exclude nothing’ by inviting strong dissent into decision-making. Yet his Second Inaugural (1865)—‘with malice toward none’—shows ‘exaggerate nothing’: no demonization, no triumphalism. He neither amputated unwelcome perspectives nor inflated partial truths for effect. Modern teams echo this by combining red-team reviews with honest metrics: they surface inconvenient data, then resist the urge to oversell early wins. In such cultures, trust grows precisely because nothing necessary is hidden and nothing incidental is magnified.
A Daily Craft of Becoming Whole
Finally, wholeness ripens through habit. The Ignatian ‘examen’ (c. 1548) offers a brief daily review: notice consolations and desolations without disguising either, and resolve small course corrections. Likewise, expressive writing has been shown to reduce rumination by naming experience plainly (Pennebaker, 1997). A simple practice follows: each evening, list what you avoided, what you played up, and what you actually value. Then schedule one next action that includes the neglected and right-sizes the overstated. Repeated quietly, this loop makes Pessoa’s sentence operational: nothing essential excluded, nothing authentic exaggerated—and, in that proportion, greatness becomes possible.