Turning Fear into a Catalyst for Action
Created at: September 10, 2025
What would you do if you weren't afraid? — Sheryl Sandberg
A Question That Reframes Possibility
Sheryl Sandberg’s challenge—“What would you do if you weren’t afraid?”—shifts the locus of control from circumstance to choice. In Lean In (2013), she uses it as a lens to examine ambitions we quietly defer, not because they are impossible, but because fear edits them out before they get airtime. By momentarily subtracting fear, the question surfaces a truer map of desire. Crucially, this is not an invitation to recklessness. Rather, it is a thought experiment that clarifies goals first, so we can later reintroduce risk with deliberation. Once we see what we actually want, we can plan the smallest courageous step toward it.
How Fear Skews Our Choices
Fear often masquerades as prudence. Prospect Theory shows that losses loom larger than gains, nudging us to overprotect the status quo (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979). This tilt explains why staying put feels safer than trying something new, even when upside potential is meaningful. Moreover, status quo bias further cements inaction; people disproportionately prefer existing options simply because they are familiar (Samuelson & Zeckhauser, 1988). Seen through this lens, Sandberg’s question acts like a counterweight—it challenges the automatic preference for “what is” and rebalances the evaluation of “what could be.”
The Hidden Cost of Not Acting
Because fear is vivid and immediate, we discount the quiet expense of opportunities we never pursue. Hospice nurse Bronnie Ware’s memoir The Top Five Regrets of the Dying (2011) reports a recurring lament: wishes left unattempted. While anecdotal, her reflections echo a broader truth—inaction has a price, it merely invoices later. Thus, the question becomes economic as much as emotional: what return might we forgo by protecting ourselves from discomfort today? Framed this way, courage is not just valor; it is an investment decision with compounding effects.
Designing Courage with Practical Tools
If fear is predictable, we can engineer around it. Tim Ferriss’s “fear-setting” (TED, 2017) invites us to define worst-case scenarios, draft prevention steps, and specify recovery plans. By naming the monster, we shrink it to workable size. Similarly, a project “pre-mortem” asks teams to pretend a plan has failed and list reasons why (Gary Klein, Harvard Business Review, 2007). This anticipatory hindsight converts vague dread into solvable risks. Together, these methods honor fear’s information without letting it dictate the agenda—bridging Sandberg’s aspirational question with operational realism.
Environments That Make Bravery Possible
Individual daring flourishes in cultures that tolerate intelligent risk. Amy Edmondson’s research on psychological safety shows teams learn more when members feel safe to speak up and err (Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999). Echoing this, Google’s Project Aristotle identified psychological safety as the top predictor of team effectiveness (re:Work, 2015). Therefore, answering the question isn’t solely a personal act; it’s also a design challenge for leaders. By rewarding informed experiments and debriefing failures, organizations convert fear from a censor into a tutor.
Gendered Fears and Structural Realities
Sandberg wrote with women’s experiences in view, where fear is often amplified by real penalties. Experimental studies document backlash when women display assertiveness in male-typed domains (Heilman et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2004). Likewise, Babcock and Laschever’s Women Don’t Ask (2003) shows how social costs discourage negotiating—shaping what feels “reasonable” to want. Thus, courage must be paired with structural change: sponsorship, transparent criteria, equitable leave policies, and bias-aware evaluation. Bravery scales when systems reduce the extra toll it exacts.
Daily Practices to Cross the Threshold
Finally, courage compounds through small, repeated moves. Try a 30–90 day pilot instead of a permanent leap; make the experiment cheap and reversible. Use WOOP—Wish, Outcome, Obstacle, Plan—to pre-commit to actions when obstacles arise (Gabriele Oettingen, Rethinking Positive Thinking, 2014). Close the loop with reflection: each week, ask Sandberg’s question, list one fear-bounded action, and schedule a first, smallest step. Over time, the practice rewires identity—from someone who waits for certainty to someone who learns into it.