Site logo

The Quiet Reward of Work Well Done

Created at: October 11, 2025

The reward for getting things done is to have done them. — W. E. B. Du Bois
The reward for getting things done is to have done them. — W. E. B. Du Bois

The reward for getting things done is to have done them. — W. E. B. Du Bois

Completion as Immediate Fulfillment

Du Bois’s aphorism pivots our attention from prizes and praise to the intrinsic satisfaction of finishing. To have done a thing is to realize its purpose; the act consummates itself. Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics (c. 350 BC) frames a deed’s telos—the end toward which it strives—as the source of its worth, suggesting that fulfillment arrives when form meets function in action. Thus, the reward is not deferred; it is present in the closure of the task. The done-ness is proof of agency, skill, and coherence between intention and outcome.

Du Bois’s Practice of Purposeful Work

Extending this idea, W. E. B. Du Bois embodied a life where achievement validated effort. The Philadelphia Negro (1899) and The Souls of Black Folk (1903) show scholarship harnessed to social transformation; each completed study anchored immediate moral meaning rather than waiting on external validation. For Du Bois, doing—researching, organizing, publishing—was already a form of arrival. The finished work created public knowledge and civic leverage, illustrating how completion can be both personal fulfillment and communal instrument.

Intrinsic Motivation and the Science of Flow

Converging with this ethic, self-determination theory argues that autonomy, competence, and relatedness make tasks rewarding in themselves (Deci & Ryan, 1985; 2000). When we act from internal values, accomplishment feels self-authored and thus satisfying. Similarly, Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi’s Flow (1990) documents how deeply absorbing work yields a felt payoff during and after effort. The reward, on this view, is the experience of mastery and its completion, not the medal pinned afterward.

The Craft and the Afterglow of Doing

Consider a carpenter setting the final dovetail: the joint’s snug silence is its own applause. Likewise, a programmer closing a stubborn bug experiences a sudden lightness; the improved system stands as the only endorsement needed. In both cases, the object completed reflects the maker back to themselves. Building on this, the afterglow of done-ness is durable because it is embodied in the work itself—something one can point to, return to, and build upon.

When External Rewards Backfire

However, piling on incentives can paradoxically thin the pleasure of completion. A meta-analysis by Deci, Koestner, and Ryan (1999) found that certain extrinsic rewards undermine intrinsic motivation. Teresa Amabile’s research on creativity (1996) likewise shows that heavy external pressure narrows exploration. Consequently, if we chase prizes, we risk shifting attention from the integrity of the task to its payoff, diluting the felt reward that Du Bois highlights.

Closure, Memory, and the Relief of Done

Cognitive science adds texture: Bluma Zeigarnik (1927) showed that unfinished tasks cling to memory; completion releases tension. Relatedly, the goal-gradient effect (Hull, 1932; later replicated in loyalty settings by Kivetz, Urminsky, and Zheng, 2006) shows motivation intensifying near completion—suggesting a built-in appetite for closure. Thus, the moment of finishing satisfies both the mind’s need for resolution and the will’s desire to see intention realized.

Designing Lives Around Finished Things

Turning principle into practice, we can structure work to make the reward of done-ness vivid: define clear, finishable tasks; keep a done list; ship small increments; and stage visible handoffs. Agile sprints, studio critiques, or public demos each convert completion into shared knowledge. By foregrounding closure, we nurture momentum and let the work’s integrity supply motivation.

From Personal Task to Collective Liberation

Finally, Du Bois’s line scales from the desk to the polis. When a community registers voters, publishes data, or builds a school, the reward is the achieved capacity those acts create. In his activism and sociology alike, the finished deed was both evidence and engine of freedom. Therefore, to have done the thing is not only enough; it is how change becomes real.