From 'I Can't' to Curious Possibility

3 min read

Turn every 'I can't' into a question of how you might — Carl Sagan

The Sagan Reframe

Carl Sagan’s line converts a closed door into a corridor: instead of declaring defeat, it invites a question that searches for a pathway. By shifting from a verdict to a query, we reclaim agency and widen the field of options. Cosmos (1980) models this posture throughout—treating the unknown not as a wall but as an invitation to explore, measure, and learn. In this way, an obstacle becomes a map, and curiosity becomes the compass.

Science as a Habit of Questioning

Building on this, science operationalizes the move from “can’t” to “how might” through hypotheses and tests. Sagan’s The Demon-Haunted World (1995) champions tools—skepticism, evidence, and clarity—that transform bafflement into structured inquiry. Rather than “We can’t know,” the scientific habit asks, “How might we test what we think we know?” This subtle change reframes limits as provisional and penetrable, turning mysteries into research programs rather than dead ends.

Design Thinking’s ‘How Might We’

Likewise, innovators codified this stance in the “How might we” prompt, popularized by IDEO (Kelley & Littman, The Art of Innovation, 2001). In a well-known collaboration with Kaiser Permanente, reframing “We can’t fix chaotic shift handoffs” into “How might we make information flow safer and clearer?” led to redesigned protocols and fewer errors. The question did not magically remove constraints; instead, it oriented teams to probe them creatively and iteratively until a workable path emerged.

Psychology of Reframing and Growth

Meanwhile, personal psychology explains why the shift matters. Carol Dweck’s research on growth mindset (2006) shows that ability often expands when effort meets strategy and feedback; phrasing goals as questions invites exactly that. Albert Bandura’s work on self-efficacy (1997) further suggests that believing in one’s capacity grows with small, successfully mastered challenges. Even cognitive therapy—from Aaron Beck onward (1979)—uses cognitive reappraisal to replace rigid, defeatist thoughts with problem-focused alternatives. In short, questions lower the emotional load of failure and raise the odds of action.

Socratic Roots of Productive Doubt

This habit is older than modern labs. In Plato’s Meno (c. 380 BC), Socrates converts uncertainty into inquiry, guiding a young servant through geometric reasoning by asking structured questions. Rather than conceding, “I can’t know,” the dialogue enacts, “How might we discover what we already half-understand?” This ancient scene foreshadows Sagan’s modern counsel: disciplined questioning can unlock latent knowledge that declarations of impotence keep sealed.

Voyager’s Golden Record: Asking Anyway

Consider the Voyager missions. Faced with the seeming impossibility of speaking to unknown minds, Sagan’s team asked, “How might we send an intelligible hello?” The result—gold-plated disks of sounds and images curated for extraterrestrials—became the Golden Record (Sagan et al., Murmurs of Earth, 1978). Even the Pale Blue Dot reflection (1994) pivots from cosmic smallness to, “How might we live responsibly on this mote?” In both cases, the question changes paralysis into purpose.

A Daily Practice for Reframing

Finally, make the idea concrete. When you notice “I can’t,” immediately draft three versions of “How might I…?”—one generous, one constrained by reality, and one tiny and testable. Pick the smallest viable step and schedule ten focused minutes, then review what you learned and adjust the next question. For example, “I can’t learn calculus” becomes “How might I master limits this week?” and then “How might I solve three limit problems tonight using a worked example?” Over time, the habit compounds into capability.