Speak less about the problem and more about the solution; action prefers makers. — bell hooks
From Problem Talk to Solution Work
To begin, hooks’ imperative redirects energy from exhaustive diagnosis to disciplined making. In 'Theory as Liberatory Practice' (1991), she argues that theory matters only insofar as it helps us live differently; 'Teaching to Transgress' (1994) turns classrooms into sites of freedom by privileging experiment over performance. Speaking less about the problem is not denial but design: it shifts attention to capacities, coalitions, and concrete next steps. In this framing, every critique demands a prototype that embodies the change it calls for. With that orientation set, the question becomes how to move from idea to impact without losing rigor.
Praxis as the Engine of Freedom
Building on that, praxis—reflection and action in concert—drives transformation. Paulo Freire’s 'Pedagogy of the Oppressed' (1970) names praxis as the cycle that converts awareness into liberation; hooks extends it through feminist, antiracist pedagogy that centers lived experience. Practically, this means short loops: test, learn, revise, and test again. Reflection remains vital, yet it is accountable to what our hands build and communities keep. When critique and craft interlock, momentum replaces cynicism. This logic naturally invites maker-friendly methods that turn plans into prototypes quickly and ethically.
Design Habits That Favor Makers
Accordingly, adopt routines that bias toward action: time-boxed sprints, low-fidelity prototypes, public demos, and 'one-week experiments.' Tim Brown’s 'Change by Design' (2009) and the d.school popularized this stance; Eric Ries’ 'Lean Startup' (2011) adds build-measure-learn discipline. Try a 'two good options' rule to avoid analysis paralysis; commit to ship something small on a fixed date. A campus group once replaced a 'complaint wall' with a Saturday repair day: sewing mending, bike tune-ups, and a mutual aid pantry. Thirty volunteers fixed 112 items and left with a shared backlog and schedule. Talk shrank; competence grew. As these habits settle, participation deepens, priming co-creation with those most affected.
Make With, Not For
Therefore, make with, not for. hooks insists that people at the margins author solutions, not merely supply data ('Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center,' 1984). Methods include story circles traced to Septima Clark and Ella Baker; participatory budgeting first scaled in Porto Alegre (1989); and participatory action research that pays community co-investigators. Co-creation begins with shared problem framing, fair compensation, and the right to veto. When makers are the community, solutions fit context and endure. This collaborative stance, in turn, demands measures that honor both outcomes and dignity.
Measure What Liberation Feels Like
Moreover, measure what liberation feels like and what it changes. Blend outcome metrics (uptake, cost, time saved) with equity and agency indicators: who decides, who benefits, who learns. Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan, 2000) suggests tracking autonomy, competence, and relatedness; hooks’ 'Teaching Community' (2003) echoes these as classroom freedoms. In a youth media lab co-designed with girls of color, retention rose 40% when editorial control rotated and stipends were peer-set; participants reported higher agency on exit surveys. With feedback in hand, teams can scale capacity without diluting values.
From Solo Effort to Collective Capacity
Next, shift from heroic individuals to resilient collectives. Mutual aid networks, worker cooperatives like Mondragon (founded 1956), and the Combahee River Collective Statement (1977) show how shared ownership turns critique into durable structure. Practically, use light constitutions, transparent ledgers, distributed facilitation, and succession plans from day one. Document roles and rotate them; publish playbooks so newcomers can replicate success. With structure aligned to values, a simple, repeatable cadence keeps progress steady.
A Ninety-Day Maker Spiral
A 90-day maker spiral: (1) Frame a solvable slice in one sentence; define 'done' and non-negotiable ethics. (2) Gather a four-to-seven person maker cell with lived experience. (3) Co-design two low-cost prototypes; commit to delivering one within two weeks. (4) Put it in the world with safeguards; invite public critique. (5) Measure outcomes and agency; decide to iterate, pivot, or stop. (6) Document openly; publish a how-we-did-it note; mentor a new cell. (7) Secure micro-resources (space, tools, childcare) and hand off roles. Repeat. Finally, as hooks would remind us, the proof of any liberatory idea is the life it enables—so keep making.