Turning Waiting into Purposeful Preparatory Action

3 min read

Refuse to be passive in waiting; transform waiting into preparation. — Viktor E. Frankl

Choosing Agency in the Pause

At the outset, Frankl’s injunction reframes waiting from a vacuum into a choice of stance. In Man’s Search for Meaning (1946), he argues that meaning arises when we direct our freedom—however small—toward a purpose. Waiting, then, need not be inert; it can become a workshop for character, skill, and readiness. Frankl recounts reconstructing his lost manuscript in memory and counseling fellow prisoners, thereby transforming enforced delay into disciplined preparation. From this perspective, passivity is not imposed by circumstance but invited by resignation.

The Psychology of Active Waiting

Building on this existential pivot, behavioral research shows why activity during delays matters. David H. Maister’s The Psychology of Waiting Lines (1985) notes that occupied time feels shorter and less stressful than unoccupied time—suggesting that structured tasks reduce anxiety. Moreover, implementation intentions—if-then plans defined by Peter Gollwitzer (1999)—prime automatic action when cues appear, turning uncertainty into triggers. Complementing this, Gabriele Oettingen’s WOOP method in Rethinking Positive Thinking (2014) channels desire through obstacle-aware planning, ensuring that preparation aligns with reality rather than fantasy.

From Delay to Deliberate Practice

To operationalize the idea, convert idle intervals into rehearsals that raise the ceiling on performance. A pre-mortem, described by Gary Klein (HBR, 2007), imagines the project has failed and asks why—creating checklists and contingencies ahead of time. Anders Ericsson and Robert Pool’s Peak (2016) shows that targeted drills with feedback, not sheer hours, compound expertise; even ten spare minutes can refine a weak sub-skill. Likewise, Atul Gawande’s The Checklist Manifesto (2009) demonstrates how simple, prebuilt routines turn chaotic moments into repeatable successes when the real test arrives.

Examples That Reward Preparation

History and daily life echo this logic. Captain Chesley “Sully” Sullenberger credits decades of recurrent training for his calm engine-out glide in 2009; his memoir Highest Duty (2009) shows how practiced checklists made decisive action possible. Similarly, NASA’s relentless simulations allowed the Apollo 13 team to improvise life-saving procedures under pressure (Gene Kranz, Failure Is Not an Option, 2000). In both cases, what looked like split-second brilliance was actually deferred time, patiently converted into preparation long before the crisis.

Preparing When Only Attitude Is Possible

Even when external constraints are total, inner readiness remains within reach. Frankl called this the realm of “attitudinal values,” where one’s response to unavoidable suffering becomes a moral act; his essay “The Case for a Tragic Optimism” (1984) argues for finding meaning despite loss. In such waits—medical results, visa approvals—preparation can be mental: journaling priorities, rehearsing calm breathing, composing difficult conversations, and clarifying non-negotiables. Thus, when circumstances finally open, you meet them with a practiced mind rather than a startled one.

A Practical Loop for Preparatory Waiting

Practically speaking, use a five-step loop: define the horizon (what event am I awaiting?), inventory gaps (skills, information, relationships), design drills (short, feedback-rich reps), set triggers (if X occurs, I do Y), and reflect briefly (what improved, what still fails?). Time-box to small windows—5–15 minutes—to reduce friction, and attach drills to cues you already encounter (e.g., commute, queue, hold music). This keeps preparation light yet cumulative, so readiness accretes without waiting for perfect conditions.

Avoiding Busywork and Overpreparation

Finally, beware two traps. First, precrastination—the urge to do anything early, even the wrong thing—can waste energy (Rosenbaum et al., Psychological Science, 2014). Counter it by ranking tasks by impact under likely scenarios. Second, overpreparation breeds false confidence; stress-test plans with small pilots, red-team critiques, or time constraints to surface weaknesses. By privileging feedback over volume, you ensure that preparation remains purposeful—fulfilling Frankl’s call to refuse passivity and turn waiting into a disciplined readiness.