Paint Larger Labels: Living Beyond Fear’s Frame
Refuse to frame yourself by fear; paint a larger label and live inside it. — Simone de Beauvoir
Refusing Fear’s Frame: An Existential Opening
At the outset, the line urges an existential refusal: do not let fear draw the borders of your identity. Simone de Beauvoir’s ethic of freedom rests on the idea that we are condemned to be free and thus responsible for the meanings we create. In The Ethics of Ambiguity (1947), she contends that anxiety is the shadow of freedom; we can either shrink to ease the feeling or step forward and author our projects despite it. Therefore, the first move is negative but decisive—declining the cramped frame fear offers.
From Immanence to Transcendence
Building on this refusal, Beauvoir distinguishes immanence—being confined to given roles—from transcendence—surpassing oneself through action. The Second Sex (1949) crystallizes this shift with “One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman,” highlighting how social scripts can trap or be rewritten. To “paint a larger label” is to name a project spacious enough to invite growth; to “live inside it” is to enact it daily. In her view, freedom is not a feeling but a practice: we prove our chosen identity by the initiatives we sustain.
Labels as Acts: Naming that Makes Worlds
Moreover, naming can be performative. J. L. Austin’s How to Do Things with Words (1962) shows that some utterances don’t just describe; they do. Judith Butler’s Gender Trouble (1990) later extends this insight, arguing identity is iteratively performed. Consequently, a larger label is not a boast but a blueprint. Consider a novice coder who adopts “systems thinker in training”: this phrase reorganizes attention—toward architecture reviews, documentation quality, and mentorship. The label shapes choices, and repeated choices make a life.
Evidence from Psychology: Identity Guides Action
Psychology echoes this power of self-definition. Hazel Markus and Paula Nurius’s “possible selves” (1986) explain how envisioned identities steer motivation. Daphna Oyserman’s identity-based motivation research shows goals feel easier when they fit one’s chosen identity. Conversely, Claude Steele’s stereotype threat (1995) demonstrates how narrow, fear-laden labels can sap performance. Relatedly, Carol Dweck’s growth mindset findings suggest identities framed around learning expand persistence. In short, when the label grows, so does the behavioral repertoire that fits it.
Practicing a Larger Label Each Day
To make this concrete, write a capacious self-description that uses verbs, not static traits—“I build communities of inquiry” rather than “I’m smart.” Then align actions using implementation intentions (“If it’s 8 a.m., I draft three paragraphs”) per Peter Gollwitzer (1999). Add a premortem (Gary Klein) to defang fear: imagine the project failed, list reasons, and address them now. Finally, design environments that cue the label—communities, tools, and rituals that make the larger identity the easy default.
An Ethical Test and Iterative Becoming
Finally, Beauvoir insists that authentic freedom affirms others’ freedom; domination shrinks both parties. Thus, test your larger label by asking: does living inside it widen possibilities for those around me? If yes, the project aligns with her ethics of reciprocity. And because existence is ambiguous, expect revisions. Titles may change, but the throughline remains: refusing fear’s small frame, choosing a roomier name for your becoming, and proving it—one sustained act at a time.