Crafting Progress: Attention, Exactness, and Steady Belief
Build with attention: steady, exact, and believing in small progress. — Susan Sontag
What Sontag Asks of Builders
Sontag’s imperative wraps three virtues—attention, steadiness, and exactness—inside a quiet faith in incremental gains. Rather than promising breakthroughs, she recommends a temperament: look closely, move deliberately, and trust that small advances compound. This is less a productivity hack than an ethos for making anything that lasts, from an essay to a bridge. It resists the lure of speed and spectacle, suggesting that quality is the byproduct of care maintained over time.
Attention as an Artistic Ethic
This ethic echoes across Sontag’s criticism. In Against Interpretation (1966), she argues for an “erotics of art,” urging readers to notice form before imposing meaning—a discipline of seeing rather than rushing to decode. Likewise, On Photography (1977) examines how images mediate reality, requiring us to attend to framing, selection, and the power dynamics of looking. In both cases, attention is not passive; it is an active, exacting practice that sharpens judgment and deepens understanding.
Steady and Exact: Lessons from Craft
To see how steadiness and exactness meet, consider design and craft. Mies van der Rohe’s credo “God is in the details” (attributed) captures a builder’s patience: the integrity of the whole rests on small joints, clean edges, and measured tolerances. Similarly, Carlo Scarpa’s museum fittings marry millimeter precision with warmth, showing how care accumulates into presence. Even Japanese kintsugi teaches that careful repair can heighten beauty—an exactness that respects time rather than disguising it.
Believing in Small Progress
Belief matters because small steps can feel invisible. The Japanese notion of kaizen foregrounds daily, modest improvements that gradually reshape systems. In sport, Dave Brailsford’s “marginal gains” strategy—1% improvements in sleep, hygiene, and mechanics—contributed to Team Sky’s Tour de France victories (2012–2013), illustrating how aggregation turns increments into advantage. The lesson travels well: reliable micro-improvements, tracked and sustained, beat sporadic spurts of brilliance.
The Science of Incremental Mastery
Research on skill development reinforces Sontag’s wisdom. Anders Ericsson’s work on deliberate practice (summarized in Peak, 2016) shows experts improve by targeting specific weaknesses with feedback—precision plus repetition. Likewise, the juggling study by Draganski et al. (Nature, 2004) found structural brain changes after incremental practice, suggesting that small, repeated efforts literally reshape neural tissue. Thus, steady exactness is not romantic rhetoric; it is a neurobiological pathway to competence.
Habits That Embody the Ethos
Finally, translating belief into routine sustains progress. Atul Gawande’s The Checklist Manifesto (2009) demonstrates how simple checklists reduce errors—exactness operationalized. Many creators use brief, focused intervals (Pomodoro) to protect attention, or daily pages (Julia Cameron’s The Artist’s Way, 1992) to keep the hand moving. Coupled with tight feedback loops—draft, review, refine—these habits cultivate the temperament Sontag names: careful, unhurried, and confident that tomorrow’s 1% will meet today’s. In time, the accumulation becomes unmistakable.