Self-Governance, Not Supremacy: Wollstonecraft’s Claim
I do not wish women to have power over men; but over themselves. — Mary Wollstonecraft
Autonomy Over Domination
At first glance, the line rejects a zero-sum battle between the sexes; instead, it centers the moral project of self-mastery. In A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792), Wollstonecraft argues that women should become rational, independent agents, not rulers over men. The aim is equality of personhood, where each governs their own conscience and choices. Moving from this clarification, the quote pivots the debate away from conquering others to cultivating character. By grounding power in inner governance rather than external control, it reframes liberation as the capacity to act according to reason and virtue, not as the right to dominate.
Enlightenment Roots of Self-Rule
From there, her vision arises squarely within Enlightenment debates about freedom and rationality. Kant’s ‘Sapere aude’ (1784) urged individuals to use their own understanding; Wollstonecraft simply asks why women were excluded from that summons. She challenges Rousseau’s Émile (1762), where Sophie is educated to please rather than to think, exposing a contradiction in social-contract ideals that proclaimed universal reason but practiced partial citizenship. Consequently, autonomy becomes a universal standard. If reason is a human capacity, then self-government must be a human right—an argument that shifts the question from social custom to moral principle.
Education as the Engine of Agency
Naturally, the route to self-possession runs through education. Wollstonecraft contends that without rigorous schooling, women are trained for dependence, not deliberation. Her own experience—founding a girls’ school at Newington Green in the 1780s and writing Thoughts on the Education of Daughters (1787)—made the case concrete: teach women to reason, and they will govern themselves. Moreover, A Vindication (1792) links education to civic virtue. Rational mothers raise rational citizens, and educated women become partners in public life, not ornaments of private households. Thus pedagogy becomes the practical bridge from principle to lived autonomy.
Law, Property, and Bodily Integrity
In turn, self-governance demands legal and economic supports. The Seneca Falls Declaration (1848) and reforms like the Married Women’s Property Acts in Britain (1870, 1882) and debates influenced by Mill’s The Subjection of Women (1869) illustrate how control over earnings, contracts, and custody can operationalize ‘power over themselves.’ Without such rights, autonomy remains aspirational. Equally crucial is bodily integrity—consent, safety, and reproductive decision-making—because the self cannot be self-governing if its fundamental choices are coerced. Legal recognition of these domains translates moral equality into everyday sovereignty.
Reframing Power as Capability
Expanding this idea, modern ethics recast power as the capability to lead a life one has reason to value. Amartya Sen’s Development as Freedom (1999) and Martha Nussbaum’s Women and Human Development (2000) describe freedoms—education, health, income, legal recourse—as the real substance of agency. This lens complements Wollstonecraft’s insight: sovereignty begins within but is secured by social conditions. Therefore, the question becomes not who rules whom, but whether each person possesses the capabilities to choose, to dissent, and to flourish. Such power is distributive and enabling, not dominative.
Misreadings and Modern Echoes
Today, her line is sometimes mistaken for antagonism toward men. Yet the phrasing rejects supremacy altogether; it calls for mutual liberty grounded in self-command. Simone de Beauvoir’s The Second Sex (1949) echoes this shift from rivalry to recognition: woman becomes subject, not object. Contemporary movements—ranging from CEDAW (1979) to #MeToo (2017)—continue the work of securing conditions for self-rule. When structures align with agency, Wollstonecraft’s hope is realized: women do not seek power over men, but the full, responsible authorship of their own lives.