If a problem is fixable, there is no need to worry. — Dalai Lama
—What lingers after this line?
One-minute reflection
Where does this idea show up in your life right now?
A Simple Rule for Emotional Triage
The Dalai Lama’s line offers a clean way to sort life’s stressors: if a problem can be fixed, energy is better spent fixing it than fearing it. In that sense, worry becomes a kind of misallocated attention—an alarm that keeps ringing even after we’ve identified the exit. From this starting point, the quote doesn’t deny that problems hurt or feel urgent; it suggests a practical pivot. Once “fixable” is established, the next sensible question is not “What if?” but “What’s the next action?” That shift is the doorway from rumination to relief.
Worry vs. Action: Two Different Loops
Worry often loops in circles: replaying scenarios, anticipating embarrassment, or imagining failure. Action, by contrast, moves forward in steps—small, sometimes awkward steps, but steps that change conditions. This distinction matters because worry can feel productive while producing nothing. As a transition, notice how the quote subtly redefines control. If a fix exists, you have leverage; and when you have leverage, the rational response is to use it. Even a modest action—sending one email, making one appointment, drafting one plan—often breaks the spell of anxious repetition.
The Stoic Echo: Focus on What You Can Control
This advice aligns with a long philosophical tradition. Epictetus’ Enchiridion (c. 125 AD) draws a boundary between what is “up to us” and what is not, arguing that peace comes from investing attention only where agency exists. The Dalai Lama’s “fixable” functions like Epictetus’ “controllable,” translating an ancient principle into everyday language. Building on that parallel, the quote also hints at a discipline: when the mind drifts toward dread, bring it back to the controllable slice of the situation. That slice may be small, but it is real—and acting on it is often the most direct form of calm.
A Modern Psychological Lens on Problem-Solving
Contemporary psychology makes a similar distinction between problem-focused coping and emotion-focused coping, described by Lazarus and Folkman’s Stress, Appraisal, and Coping (1984). When a stressor is changeable, problem-focused strategies—planning, seeking information, taking concrete steps—tend to reduce distress more reliably than pure mental rehearsals. Seen this way, the Dalai Lama’s point is not mere optimism; it’s an evidence-friendly strategy. If the situation can be changed, shifting into problem-solving mode reduces both the objective problem and the subjective sense of helplessness that fuels anxiety.
Tiny Fixes and the Power of the Next Step
“Fixable” doesn’t always mean “quick.” Sometimes the fix is incremental—like paying down debt, rebuilding trust, or learning a new skill. Yet even in long projects, worry usually spikes when the next step is unclear. Clarifying just one immediate move can convert a foggy threat into a sequence. For example, a person anxious about a job interview might spiral for days, but the fixable portion is straightforward: prepare two stories of past achievements, research the company, practice aloud once. The moment preparation begins, the mind receives proof that progress is possible, and worry loses its monopoly.
The Hidden Second Half: When Problems Aren’t Fixable
Implicitly, the quote invites a complementary stance: if a problem is not fixable, worry still doesn’t help. In Buddhist teachings, suffering is often intensified by clinging to outcomes we cannot control; acceptance becomes an active skill rather than passive resignation. The Dalai Lama’s framing therefore covers both categories—fix it if you can, release it if you cannot. Closing the loop, the deeper lesson is about conserving inner resources. Whether through action or acceptance, the aim is the same: meet reality directly instead of feeding it extra pain through anxious repetition.