Welcoming Change While Standing Firm on Values
Created at: October 12, 2025
Open your arms to change, but don't let go of your values. — Dalai Lama
A Compass for Changing Landscapes
The Dalai Lama’s counsel separates what should move from what must remain. Methods, tools, and tactics are like the terrain—ever-shifting—while values serve as the compass that orients our steps. In other words, openness to novelty need not erode moral clarity; rather, it can refine how we live our principles. Heraclitus’s fragments (c. 500 BC) remind us that we never step into the same river twice, yet a navigational North Star still guides safe passage. By distinguishing core ends from adaptable means, we achieve resilience without drift.
Anchored Adaptation in Tibetan Exile
To see this in practice, consider the Dalai Lama’s own trajectory. After the 1959 exile, Tibetan institutions modernized education while preserving language, ritual, and ethical precepts. He invited scientific dialogue through the Mind & Life Institute (founded 1987) and encouraged monastics to study neuroscience alongside Buddhist epistemology, as recounted in The Universe in a Single Atom (2005). Thus, tradition did not barricade itself against change; it sifted innovations through enduring commitments—compassion, nonviolence, and human dignity—transforming exile into a laboratory for principled renewal.
Philosophy: Stable Ends, Flexible Means
Philosophically, this stance marries firm ends with adaptable methods. Aristotle’s phronesis in Nicomachean Ethics (c. 350 BC) portrays practical wisdom as the art of selecting context-sensitive means to realize stable virtues like courage and justice. Conversely, Kant’s Groundwork (1785) frames an invariant moral demand—treating persons as ends in themselves—while allowing wide latitude in execution. Read together, they suggest a living ethic: unwavering about the dignity we honor, inventive about how we honor it as circumstances evolve.
Psychology of Values and Flexibility
Modern research reinforces this balance. Shalom H. Schwartz’s values theory (1992) shows that while individuals prioritize different terminal values, these preferences are surprisingly stable across life events. Meanwhile, growth mindset studies (Carol Dweck, Mindset, 2006) and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy’s psychological flexibility (Hayes, Strosahl, & Wilson, 1999) show how adaptability—trying new strategies, reframing setbacks—boosts learning and well-being. Crucially, flexibility aims at chosen values: we pivot methods not because we drift, but because we care enough to improve how we live what matters.
Organizations: Pivoting Without Losing the Plot
Extending this logic to institutions, successful change preserves mission while revising models. Netflix’s move from DVDs to streaming (c. 2007) retained its promise of effortless entertainment delivery, merely upgrading the channel. Adobe’s shift to Creative Cloud (2012) protected its value of empowering creators while reinventing distribution. By contrast, Kodak, despite pioneering digital imaging, clung to film-era economics and stumbled; as Christensen’s The Innovator’s Dilemma (1997) shows, firms often confuse defending values with defending legacy mechanisms. The lesson aligns with Kotter’s Leading Change (1996): tell a consistent purpose story, then let processes evolve.
A Practical Playbook for Daily Decisions
Finally, put principle into practice with simple habits. First, craft a one-page values charter—three to five nonnegotiables with brief definitions. Next, apply an integrity test to choices: Does this advance my values, violate them, or merely preserve comfort? Set red lines (actions you will not take) and green lines (experiments you will try for 30–90 days). Seek a diverse “truth council” that can challenge blind spots, and run small pilots before scaling. In this way, you welcome change as a tutor, while your values remain the teacher.