Hope is passion for the possible. — Søren Kierkegaard
—What lingers after this line?
Defining Hope Beyond Wishfulness
At first glance, Kierkegaard’s line transforms hope from a passive feeling into an active force. To call hope “passion for the possible” means that hope is not mere daydreaming; rather, it is an inward energy that leans toward what does not yet exist but could come to be. In this sense, hope lives between reality and imagination, drawing strength from both. Seen this way, hope differs from simple optimism. Optimism expects things to work out, whereas hope remains emotionally invested even when outcomes are uncertain. Kierkegaard’s wider authorship, especially in *The Sickness Unto Death* (1849), often explores the tension between present limitation and inward freedom, making this compact statement feel like a distilled philosophy of human striving.
Possibility as a Human Lifeline
From that starting point, the word “possible” becomes the true center of the quote. Kierkegaard suggests that human beings endure difficulty not only through facts or resources, but through the sensed presence of alternatives. Even a narrow opening—a chance for reconciliation, recovery, or reinvention—can sustain the spirit because possibility interrupts despair’s claim that the future is closed. This idea appears throughout existential thought, yet Kierkegaard gives it emotional intensity rather than abstraction. For example, in *Either/Or* (1843), he portrays life as shaped by choices that continually reopen meaning. Accordingly, hope is not attached to guarantees; it survives by fastening itself to the unfinished nature of existence.
Passion Gives Hope Its Force
If possibility provides the object of hope, passion provides its motion. Kierkegaard does not describe hope as mild preference or polite interest, but as something fervent enough to move a person inwardly and outwardly. In other words, hope matters because it stirs commitment: people study, heal, forgive, protest, and begin again because they care intensely about what may still happen. This is why hope can coexist with suffering. A patient enduring treatment, a reformer facing repeated failure, or a student rebuilding after disappointment does not persist through certainty alone. Rather, passion animates possibility, turning a remote chance into a lived orientation. As Václav Havel later wrote in *Disturbing the Peace* (1986), hope is not prediction but conviction that something makes sense regardless of outcome.
A Spiritual and Existential Dimension
Moreover, Kierkegaard’s phrase carries a spiritual undertone. Writing in nineteenth-century Denmark, he often treated the self as a being called beyond complacency, and hope becomes one expression of that call. It is the soul’s refusal to be imprisoned by the immediate moment, trusting that existence contains more depth than appearances suggest. In this respect, hope is not escapism but a disciplined openness. Kierkegaard’s *Fear and Trembling* (1843) presents faith itself as a movement toward what reason alone cannot secure. Although hope is not identical with faith, the two are clearly related: both keep the person oriented toward a future not yet visible, yet still inwardly grasped.
Hope in Ordinary Human Experience
Yet the power of the quote lies in how easily it enters ordinary life. A parent encouraging a struggling child, an artist continuing after rejection, or a community rebuilding after disaster all embody passion for the possible. In each case, hope is not sentimental decoration; it is the emotional courage that allows action before success is evident. Consequently, hope becomes practical. It influences whether people attempt repair, pursue justice, or imagine change at all. The historian Rebecca Solnit, in *Hope in the Dark* (2004), similarly argues that uncertainty is not a weakness but the very space where meaningful action becomes possible. Kierkegaard’s insight anticipates that view with striking economy.
Why the Quote Still Endures
Finally, the durability of this statement comes from its balance of realism and aspiration. Kierkegaard does not say hope is possession of the possible, only passion for it. That distinction matters: we do not control the future, but we can choose the intensity with which we face it. Hope therefore becomes less a forecast than a stance toward life itself. For modern readers, this offers a demanding consolation. It asks us neither to deny hardship nor surrender to it. Instead, it invites us to care deeply about openings not yet realized, and by caring, to remain alive to transformation. In a single sentence, Kierkegaard makes hope feel both fragile and heroic.
Recommended Reading
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
One-minute reflection
What's one small action this suggests?
Related Quotes
6 selectedHope is the dream of a waking man. - Aristotle
Aristotle
Aristotle's quote portrays hope as a form of aspiration or goal-setting that occurs in a state of awareness and consciousness, as opposed to dreams that occur during sleep.
Read full interpretation →Hope is the dream of a waking man. - Aristotle
Aristotle
This quote suggests that hope is akin to a dream that one experiences while awake. Just as dreams provide a sense of possibility and imagination during sleep, hope offers a vision for the future during waking life.
Read full interpretation →Hope is the dream of a waking man. - Aristotle
Aristotle
This quote defines hope as a conscious and active state of dreaming or desire for a better future. Unlike the passive state of dreaming during sleep, hope involves a deliberate and mindful aspiration for improvement.
Read full interpretation →Hope is the dream of the waking man. - Aristotle
Aristotle
This quote illustrates the essential role of hope in our lives. Just as dreams give direction and purpose to someone who is asleep, hope provides motivation and aspiration to those who are awake and conscious.
Read full interpretation →Hope is the thing with feathers that perches in the soul - and sings the tunes without the words - and never stops - at all. - Emily Dickinson
Emily Dickinson
Emily Dickinson uses the metaphor of a bird to represent hope. The 'thing with feathers' suggests that hope is light, delicate, but also persistent.
Read full interpretation →Hope is the dream of a waking man. - Aristotle
Aristotle
This quote defines hope as a form of dreaming or envisioning a positive future, but it happens while an individual is awake and conscious, actively aspiring for something better.
Read full interpretation →More From Author
More from Søren Kierkegaard →To know what you want to do and to do it is the same courage. — Søren Kierkegaard
At first glance, Kierkegaard’s line seems to separate thought from action, yet it quickly reunites them under a single demand: courage. To know what one truly wants is not a passive discovery, because genuine self-knowle...
Read full interpretation →The most common form of despair is not being who you are. — Søren Kierkegaard
Kierkegaard’s line reframes despair as something subtler than grief or temporary unhappiness. Rather than treating it as a passing mood, he points to a spiritual and existential condition: the suffering that arises when...
Read full interpretation →Decide what matters, then labor with a smile until it stands. — Søren Kierkegaard
Kierkegaard’s line begins with a demand that feels deceptively simple: decide what matters. In his philosophy, life is not primarily solved by accumulating information but by making commitments that shape who you become.
Read full interpretation →Leap where thought hesitates; that is how the unexpected is born. — Søren Kierkegaard
Kierkegaard’s line begins by treating hesitation not as failure but as a meaningful boundary: the moment when thought has analyzed all it can, yet still cannot guarantee an outcome. In that pause, the mind tries to prote...
Read full interpretation →